A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out in between future neighbours above the development of the wall at a coastal web site in a north Dublin suburb, a situation which has captivated countrywide focus adhering to an Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on the proposed relatives property at Sutton Strand, the place allegations of setting up breaches, environmental concerns, and lengthy-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled in the courts. The Irish Times write-up about René Collier as well as the Irish Situations posting about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what commenced as a local disagreement has progressed right into a extremely publicised legal battle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing above building functions at the positioning on Dublin Highway, Sutton, where Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a health care provider and a corporation director respectively, look for to create their household property. The case is becoming emblematic of wider disputes together Eire’s coastline, the place enhancement pressures collide with environmental protections and also the sensitivities of proven inhabitants. Based on the Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall being manufactured by their possible neighbours goes past the boundaries permitted less than setting up authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, the two people of Dublin Highway, claim that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the conditions in their setting up authorization by developing a wall over and above the boundaries of their web page, resulting in an encroachment with a Specific Region of Conservation. The SAC designation is central to your dispute, as such parts are subject to rigid controls less than European and Irish environmental legislation. Inside their court docket filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even small encroachments could have Long lasting ecological repercussions, particularly in a very delicate coastal ecosystem including Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny These are in breach in their preparing permission, and say the wall, that's partly built, is in the correct placement. Their authorized staff has characterised the motion being an make an effort to hold off or frustrate a lawful improvement. The pair accuse litigants of seeking to halt homebuilding as a way to protect their look at, an allegation which has been recurring in courtroom and referenced in coverage of the case. This accusation goes to the heart of many coastal planning disputes, exactly where views of The ocean are both of those highly prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained extraordinary initiatives because of the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by means of ocean in storm to photograph the positioning, In line with sworn evidence referenced within the Irish Times. In a single account, Rene Collier waded by waistline-large water throughout a storm to photograph the site Irish Periods, an image that has considering the fact that develop into emblematic on the intensity of the dispute. These actions weren't just symbolic; they had been meant to Obtain Visible evidence of the wall’s situation relative to tidal lines and guarded land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the website within the sea Irish Moments reported, describing how the two men entered the drinking water during critical weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by way of storm water to photograph the site grew to become Probably the most placing descriptions to emerge from courtroom reporting. The Irish Times posting about accountant Paul Feely famous that these types of actions have been cited to reveal the plaintiffs’ belief the wall prolonged into a region affected by tidal movement, strengthening their argument that the SAC was currently being encroached on.
The occasions at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 have been protected intimately from the nationwide push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Moments 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Situations January 27 2026 turned widely searched phrases as visitors sought to be aware of the history and implications of the situation. On that day, the High Court read further submissions on no matter whether interim orders really should be granted to halt design pending an entire Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a critical minute from the authorized timeline.
For the core with the dispute is often a disagreement about boundaries, planning Paul Feely and Rene Collier compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely maintain which the wall, as produced, goes outside of what was permitted and intrudes into safeguarded land. They argue that this isn't a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by profession, has been described as meticulous in his assessment of planning paperwork, maps, and problems attached to the authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have equally stressed that their motion is enthusiastic by issue for environmental defense and adherence to preparing regulation. They reject claims that the situation is about preserving a private view, insisting in its place that it's about ensuring that enhancement at Sutton Strand respects authorized and ecological limits. In affidavits, they have got described their extensive-standing connection to the region and their recognition of its environmental sensitivity.
On another facet, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed themselves as a few simply seeking to create a spouse and children residence in accordance with the legislation. They deny which the wall encroaches on a Exclusive Area of Conservation and say that each one is effective have already been performed according to Specialist information and authorized strategies. Their legal professionals have argued which the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and that the remarkable steps of René Collier and Paul Feely, which include moving into The ocean throughout a storm, tend not to alter the fundamental details.
The case has also raised broader questions about how organizing disputes are settled in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter courtroom dispute around construction of wall at coastal website is now a shorthand description for any problem that many observers see as progressively widespread. As sea degrees rise and coastal erosion intensifies, the precise delineation between non-public land, community foreshore, and protected habitats is starting to become a lot more contentious.
The Irish Occasions post about René Collier noted which the businessman had previously been linked to regional advocacy on organizing and environmental concerns, although not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Situations short article about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how men and women from quite diverse Expert backgrounds can discover on their own aligned in this kind of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some experiences spell their names, are becoming synonymous Using the Sutton Strand scenario.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the website through the sea Irish Instances protection emphasised, underlining the unusual lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded by waist-substantial h2o in the course of a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Instances and René Collier waded as a result of waist-large drinking water during a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Periods are phrases that appeared repeatedly in coverage, reflecting the two the Bodily fact with the coastline and the symbolic nature in the act. For supporters on the plaintiffs, these steps shown motivation; for critics, they illustrated the things they see being an abnormal solution.
As the High Court proceedings carry on, the outcome remains unsure. The court docket will have to identify whether or not the wall as crafted complies with scheduling authorization and whether any encroachment right into a Distinctive Area of Conservation has happened. The authorized arguments are intricate, involving interpretation of maps, tidal knowledge, and organizing situations. But the human element continues to be central: neighbours who ought to Stay alongside one another very long following the lawful expenditures are already paid.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing over design performs at the website on Dublin Highway, Sutton, although the implications of the case increase outside of that deal with. For planners, builders, and citizens alike, the dispute serves as a reminder of the value of clarity in organizing permissions and sensitivity in coastal development. What's more, it underscores how swiftly an area disagreement can escalate when basic challenges for example environmental security and home legal rights are perceived to become at stake.
Meanwhile, Sutton Strand continues to be a spot of pure elegance and contested boundaries. The wall for the centre of the dispute stands partially designed, a Actual physical manifestation of unresolved legal inquiries. Whether it is going to finally be altered, removed, or finished as planned will rely upon the court docket’s conclusions. Until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variations will probably keep on to seem in headlines, connected indelibly to one of the most closely watched planning disputes in north Dublin in recent years.